Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dimon4ik89, post: 7079932, member: 277875"]
In general, as far as I know, it is correct to do exactly as you wrote. I have never read about it anywhere, but we always played like this (live MTT or SNG, there is no difference in this), if one player was all-in, then the rest of the players usually checked until showdown, in order to knock out the one who went all-in before the flop (no matter how many players were in the hand, two, three or more, for example). And it was in those cases when one of the players had nuts, he allowed himself to make a bet, because he understood that nothing threatened him and in any case he would knock out the one who was all-in. I think that people who understand what poker is and how to play it, still play according to this strategy, as you wrote "old school")) I also went through this school in my time). If a person does as you wrote, he simply does not understand the essence of the game of poker, I think so. 
It is true that there is also a situation when the players who participate in the hand understand that the one who went all-in has the nuts, and in order to win back at least some of the chips that they paid before the flop, they create a side pot specifically for this purpose.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us