Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="eetenor, post: 6658831, member: 385063"] There seems to be a disconnect between my statements and your responses- I state TT is a standard shove you reply --not standard to see someone this bad make it to the bubble - I did not say the standard play was anything but shove therefore if your satty players play well then only ever shove I said the exploit play based on table dynamics was to deviate from standard. table dynamics - refers to recognizing players who play poorly as we play with them or if they have very loose hud stats and thus we can deviate based on that data- when a player plays this spot soo poorly- there is often a lot of previous data suggesting we can deviate--- if we are taking the time to note it- If there are two players left who both have similar tendencies or one is a calling station the other is too aggro then we can deviate from standard and just fold TT because our equity estimate for a seat goes up to 90% plus and TT seldom has 90% vs range when we shove and get called- our V who are weak call too often with hands we flip versus AQ KQs etc and fold the hands we dominate like small pairs so we are punting 30% of our equity at times-this is of course an estimate- again standard is shove but that is not the default play with table dynamics- recognizing table dynamics is where we can get a very large edge over raw equity strategies- When we want to study these spots we reverse engineer the hands-then check our player pool data to see if it supports the reverse engineering frequently enough to deviate- I recently saw a twitter post regarding a satty spot that was a fold preflop- Dara O'kearney stated it was a fold Issac Haxston disagreed then ran it - I will try to find that thread and add it to this thread [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language