Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nabmom, post: 1668489, member: 63826"] I think the bottom line here is that you can't go wrong with either. My own process with this (I just started using a HUD around end of November): I started with PT3 so that I could have the longer trial and get used to working with a HUD. My thinking was that when I went over to the shorter HEM trial, I'd already know the general concepts and be able to understand the pros of HEM more quickly. What actually happened: I used PT3. I like it. Decided that since I'd already invested time into setting it up, and since the cost is the same, it was just more convenient to just buy it and not go through the time playing with a new one. PT3 is fine and does what I need. No complaints. Other posters are right about closing the tables before the hand finishes out. That will prevent that hand from being recorded to your Hand History file. But... PT3 also lets you edit your tourney files and you can always manually enter the results. So try not to close the window too soon. But if you do, you can always update the database manually. Final thought: I debated whether it was worth the effort. I read tons of reviews online and asked the same question you're asking here and on other forums. My advice: Please get it NOW. I'm a micro-stakes recreational player and it is definitely paying for itself. Even if I'm playing only a single table. BUT: You have to take time to review hand histories, post hands on this forum, look at stats and see trends with which hands and positions are losing money for you. You can learn so much about how you play and then you can improve (= more money). [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language