Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="DS3, post: 6265622, member: 407846"]
This I largely agree with...but, I would underline that Veronica Brill ultimately stated she had her suspicions for months. It was impossible that Mike Postle was doing this on his own - he did not have direct access to the RFD technology (though there was lax security regardless) so the only conclusion was he had an accomplice(s) in house.

That said, completely agree with your next step of approaching someone such as Little privately, breaking down the hands/play and then taking their 'case' to the authorities to ultimately catch them red handed.

The shame is (as you say) we will never get to the bottom of this in a public sense. But once again I will agree in that I am sure Stones Gambling Hall ultimately had a very good idea about what had taken place and who had been involved.

By the by fundiver199, one of the best articles on the matter came a year later in Wired Magazine. Definitely worth a read and if you prefer you can listen to it as a podcast (found just a the top of the article).

[url]https://www.wired.com/story/stones-poker-cheating-scandal/[/url]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread by Casino.us

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us