Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6265593, member: 397965"]
I think, it was a reasonable first step to approach the tournament director JFK. Obviously its not your first thought, that the person in charge is in on potential cheating, and the commentators like Veronica also worked for him, so there was a natural feeling of trust and loyalty. However when JFK dismissed the claims, then the next step should definitely have been to go to the police and not the social media.

Its understandible, that Veronica wanted confirmation from more experienced poker players, that they also found Postles style suspicious. But she could just have asked someone like Bart Hansson or Jonathan Little, who had both played in some of the streams, to spend some time with her looking at the footage privately, rather than having Joe Ingram live stream his "investigation" for 30+ hours.

As for who was in on in, and how the cheating was done, we will likely never know. We do know some things about, what did [B]not[/B] happen though. During some of the suspicious hands JFK was doing commentary in the booth, so if anyone was manually feeding information to Mike in real time, it was not JFK. As I understand it, he was also not kicked out from Stones after the incidence, and unless the owners are completely dumb, that does point somewhat towards him not being directly involved in the cheating. One has to assume, the owners have quietly launched some sort of investigation into, what really happened, and then quietly gotten rid of, whoever was involved .
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language