Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
Poker News & Events
Phil Ivey wins $11 Million - Casino refuses to pay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="IntenseHeat, post: 2251929, member: 92488"] Shame on the casino is right. I was looking at some responses to this thread the other night and a thought popped into my head. Why did the casino do the things that they did? Why let him touch the cards? Why allow cards to be rotated. Is it just me, or does all of this seem peculiar, even for a high roller? If they suspected him of cheating, then why let him continue to play? I wonder, with all of the card touching and rotating and such, if they might not have initially suspected him of marking cards. While we can say edge sorting isn't really cheating, but rather a form of advantage play, I don't think that anyone could argue that card marking would not be outright cheating. I can just imagine the casino big wigs deciding what they would do. "Should we stop the game?" "No. Let's give him some more rope to hang himself with. The longer he plays, the more cards he marks, the more evidence we'll have. We'll keep our money and his. And if he doesn't like it, we can threaten to have have him arrested and charges pressed against him." But of course, he wasn't card marking. He was edge sorting. Again, I can imagine the casino manager trying to figure out what to do. "What do you mean he wasn't marking cards? You said he was marking cards!" "I said that he may be marking cards. It seems that what he was doing was edge sorting, taking advantage of the defect in the our card stock, to gain an advantage." "I wouldn't have let him keep playing or let him build his winnings up so high if I thought we were going to have to pay him." "What can we do but pay him?" "Refund his money. Give him back his stake. Tell him that this matter is under investigation. We'll see what he does. If he files suit, we might still be able to keep from paying him if we can convince a judge that he was actually cheating." I don't know. Maybe it's just me. Maybe I just have to vivid an imagination. I just doesn't make sense to me that someone wouldn't have recognized that he was edge sorting and put a stop to it. In a casino, somebody is always watching you. In fact, in a casino everyone is being watched by someone. They have watchers watching the watchers watch. And nobody saw this happening, or thought to put a stop to it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
Poker News & Events
Phil Ivey wins $11 Million - Casino refuses to pay
Top