Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 2195046, member: 23910"] Probably because he was playing in a private salon with a heap of cameras pointed at him - when the casino has video of you edge sorting it'd take a special sort of idiot to go into court claiming that you [b]weren't[/b] edge sorting. It would have been obvious to all and sundry that he was edge sorting. Obviously IANAL but I'm assuming Ivey's play here is to argue that as soon as the casino recognised he was edge sorting [B]and[/B] decided to let him keep playing instead of shutting the game down, they should have been liable for paying him if he won. After all, they were certainly going to keep his money if he lost. Again, I'm not a lawyer, but I believe the legal principle that applies here is "One Cannot Have One's Cake And Consume It Too Lest One Become A Fat Immoral Bastard". [/QUOTE]