Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OzExorcist, post: 2159046, member: 23910"] *le sigh* Did you read the articles or the rest of the thread? Yes Ivey won, but there's a [b]massive[/b] question mark over just how "fair and square" the win was. FWIW this won't always be the case - I've been in poker games where the dealer has forgotten to drop the rake from a hand, for example, or has obviously under-calculated it, and they've [b]never[/b] taken the difference out of the following hand. The game just continues on, they lost their opportunity to take that money. I'd be genuinely surprised if a punter got tracked down an hour later to rectify a minor overpayment too. A big one, sure. But a small one I don't see happening. And again, none of this is particularly relevant to this case because you're talking about genuine human error, as opposed to the deliberate cheating and freerolling that seems to have taken place in the Ivey case. [/QUOTE]