Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6480547, member: 397965"] A few points to be made here: 1) When Garrett jammed on her, she had already put in 20k, and there was money in the pot from the earlier streets. So the equities in the hand is not an argument, cheating made no sense. 2) Its not about "judging" someone. Its about legitimately thinking, there is a high chance, you just got cheated out of tousinds of dollars. No sane person would want to play in a high stakes game, if they thought, there was a high chance, cheating was going on. Therefore Garretts actions at the table were totally reasonable as well as his decision to leave the game. What was not so well handled by him or the management is, what happened backstage, and what he posted on social media afterwards. 3) I have now watched the first two hours of the previous stream, and nothing in the way, Robbi played on that stream, indicate to me, she is a recreational player. She is actually pretty good at poker, and she do all the same things, other good players do. She has good preflop hand selection. She 3-bet or raise over limps in situations, where recreational players would often just call. She bluffs quite a bit. She "downbet" on flops, which is very modern poker theory. And she give up in all the spots, where other good players would also give up. Until the controversial hand that is. Then everything change, and she make a completely wild call and happen to be right. This does not prove, she was cheating. But then something else was going on other than her just being bad at poker. I have already given a suggestion of, what that could potentially have been. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us