Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MrHachiman, post: 6480238, member: 279753"] The argument would make sense if the hand were not a flip coin at the time of the call. There was no certainty that she would win the hand with that call. I also wonder why she is forced to give an explanation that the "pro" can understand in their logic. If she's a recreational player, and she wants to pay just out of intuition, or because she just wanted to see Garrett's cards. Why should they judge her? It is hypocrisy in itself to ask a recreational player for a logical explanation in order to be satisfied with having lost. If there are doubts about cheating, there will be asking for an investigation. Accusing someone of cheating without any proof and asking for their money back is terrible behavior as a professional much more reprehensible than making a crazy call... [/QUOTE]