Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6479536, member: 397965"]
I definitely think so. If you look at Andys facial expression, when she turn over her cards, he is also deeply disturbed about, what just happened, and he was not even involved in the hand. And Andy or Garrett are not disturbed, because she played poorly and won. They are disturbed, because they think, there is a high risk, something inproper just took place. Which is absolutely not a crazy thing to think given her hand and knowing about the Mike Postle case.

I have watched many hours of televised poker including the entire PokerStars "big game" series. There were also rich recreational players like Bill Perkins playing there. But I have never seen anything remotely as crazy as this hand, except when Mike Postle played on Stones. Where Garrett went wrong is, in what happened afterwards. Accepting or asking (there are different version of this) to get his money back and then stating publicly, he is 100% sure, he got cheated, is taking it to far. There is very limited evidence other than this one hand, that cheating took place. And then people should not make public accusations, like he did.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us