G0930
Captain Fathermucker, Satty Aficionado
Loyaler
As long as AI still struggling to create images of humans with 5 fingers I wouldn't worry about it ^^
puzzlefish
Legend
Loyaler
You should go and try chatting about poker with ChatGPT. You may be surprised about what it can come up with. Try having it analyze a hand that you played, or even a whole hand history file worth of hands.
G0930
Captain Fathermucker, Satty Aficionado
Loyaler
Yes that is true but when it comes to proving you're human , AI isn't that good in it hence my example
Being able to consult AI for pokerstats won't ruin the game . Solvers and HUD do the same
puzzlefish
Legend
Loyaler
What do sites need to prove that you are human at any given point? Once registered, you are usually free to play as you like.Yes that is true but when it comes to proving you're human , AI isn't that good in it hence my example
Being able to consult AI for pokerstats won't ruin the game . Solvers and HUD do the same
I'm going to have to read this topic again because I feel like I am missing something here.
G0930
Captain Fathermucker, Satty Aficionado
Loyaler
No there isn't any proof check, was just answering Rachelle who wrote about there may be such a requirement in future
Flyer35
Legend
Platinum Level
I'll give that a try.
Flyer35
Legend
Platinum Level
Yes! I've wondered about that. You'd think something called AI would have at least a very basic understanding of human anatomy. Even a toddler knows how many fingers he's supposed to have.
T
Trendykev18
Rising Star
Bronze Level
I fully agree bots are so easy to play against especially i on a table of 6 and it is you and 5 bots. Easy chips
Vallet
Legend
Platinum Level
I agree with the opinion about artificial intelligence. Programmers using it will not even need to learn the game. They can become invincible with the level of knowledge. We can't be sure who our opponents are at the table. Regular players will think with their own heads and at some point they may make a mistake. The group of programmers will act according to the technologies of the future.
Dzill_230
Legend
Platinum Level
"I wouldn't be so optimistic—playing against bots isn't as easy money as it may seem. Yes, they are straightforward and don't use bluffing, but you won't be able to bluff against a bot either. While waiting for a good hand, you won't always get action because the bot might just fold. I regularly play against bots on a training site, and believe me, the enjoyment isn't the same as playing against a person. The satisfaction of outlasting a bot or finishing a session in profit is just a fraction of the pleasure of playing poker, which is loved precisely for the opposite."
mariussica88
Legend
Platinum Level
pentazepam
Legend
Loyaler
All the bots were one of the reasons I stopped playing semi-professionally online in 2014.
It's more a semantic question what you call them. But bots and RTA have been a thing online for at least 15 years.
With all the fast development in AI, you can just imagine how difficult it will be to know you are just playing against a human.
There is a reason people don't play chess or GO online with money at stake, for example.
Nandabio81
Enthusiast
Platinum Level
I have the impression of playing against an AI, on some platforms it is more open than on others. pokerstars is a great example of losing with AA or KK and winning with 92 or 73.
RodrigoMartins
Enthusiast
Platinum Level
That’s a really interesting take. I can definitely see how AI could completely change online poker — not just the gameplay, but the whole economy around it. If agents get good enough to mimic human behavior and consistently make profits, it could drive most casual players away. Makes you wonder how many other industries might face a similar shift once AI reaches that level
