Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6946778, member: 397965"] Quotes from the article: "The MTT Database Review account on X posted the allegation earlier on Monday, saying, "Second largest stack in day 2 of the Venom is a bot. Bot that I reported to ACR over a month ago. Including directly to Head of Security and to @WPN_CEO. Bot that I reported together with another 50 MTT bots, out of which majority is still active." "ACR Poker replied directly to that post ahead of the restart, stating that it had suspended the 'Withia' account and that the stack would be [B]blinded away[/B]. Should 'Withia' make the money, as seems likely, payouts would be adjusted." "An announcement from WPN's security department states: "In line with our security protocols and following a review of suspicious playing patterns, we have suspended the account of the player under the username 'Withia,' who currently holds the second position in chips during the ongoing multi-day tournament, The Venom $12.5 Million GTD Tourney. Should this player cash in the $12.5 Million Tournament while being blinded out, we will adhere strictly to our terms and conditions, including laddering payouts accordingly." ............................................ So basically it seems like, WPNs security checks are carried out on social media? And if an influential account with many followers claim, that a relatively new and unknown player is cheating, then ACR will ban that player to keep the majority of their audience happy? The account Withia had been playing for only 2 month prior to the Venom and was down around $9.000 over 490 games. It had paid over $3.000 in rake during this time, but likely still not as important to ACRs business as the many poker players, who follow MTT Database Review on X ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language