Forum
CardsChat Freerolls
Best Online Poker Sites
US Online Poker
Delaware Online Poker
Michigan Online Poker
Nevada Online Poker
New Jersey Online Poker
Pennsylvania Online Poker
Canada Online Poker
UK Online Poker
Australia Online Poker
India Online Poker
Ireland Online Poker
New Zealand Online Poker
Best Freerolls
Best Poker Bonuses
Best Mobile Poker Sites & Poker Apps
Poker Site Reviews
888poker
Betfair
GGpoker
PartyPoker
PokerStars
Unibet
Poker
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Strategy & Rules
30 Day Poker School
Texas Hold'em Starting Hands
Poker Games
Odds for Dummies
10 Tips for Winning Online
How Much Money Can You Make Playing Poker?
How To Play Poker
Texas Hold'em
Omaha
Omaha Hi-Lo
Badugi
Open Faced Chinese
Video Poker
Poker Hands
Tools
Poker Hands Converter
Poker Odds Calculator
Organise a Home Game
Poker Glossary
Tournaments
WSOP
WSOP Winners
WSOP History
WSOP Events
WSOP News
European Poker Tour
Best Poker Players
Poker News
Podcast
Best Online Casinos
US Online Casinos
Connecticut Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
New Jersey Online Casinos
Pennsylvania Online Casinos
West Virginia Online Casinos
Canada Online Casinos
UK Online Casinos
Australia Online Casinos
India Online Casinos
Ireland Online Casinos
New Zealand Online Casinos
Real Money Casinos
Blackjack Online Casinos
Roulette Online Casinos
Baccarat Online Casinos
Best Mobile Casinos & Apps
Best Casino Bonuses
Best Payouts
No Deposit Casinos
Free Spins
Casino Site Reviews
Betway
Casumo
JackpotCity Casino
PokerStars Casino
Ruby Fortune
Spin Casino
Casino
Free Online Casino Games
Slots
Best Online Sites
How to Play Slots
Slots Software Reviews
Real Money Gambling
US Online Gambling
Canada Online Gambling
UK Online Gambling
Australia Online Gambling
New Zealand Online Gambling
India Online Gambling
Ireland Online Gambling
Casino News
Awards
Search forums
News
Poker News
Tournament News
Casino News
Legal
Scandals
Opinion
Podcast
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
Online Poker
Poker Bot in online game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="pentazepam, post: 7101026, member: 46058"] Bots are everywhere. They took money out of the population 15 years ago. How advanced do you think they are today? [HEADING=2][SIZE=7][B]Earned 3.8 million through poker robot – goes free:[/B][/SIZE][/HEADING] "Five people walk free after building a poker robot that recorded around SEK 3.8 million. The persons were charged with fraud and convicted in District Court – to be freed in court. A statement that now stands, after the Prosecutor General has chosen not to pursue the matter further. In total, the persons, consisting of five young men, including a resident of Uppsala County, will have built a poker robot. A program designed to play poker entirely on its own – without human intervention. [HEADING=1]8.2 million rounds of play[/HEADING] 15 different accounts were set up and 8.2 million game rounds of the poker type Texas hold'em were played. Partly by the people themselves, but also through the poker robot. In total, the robot has raised a net sum of SEK 3.8 million during the year that the five individuals used the robot. Primarily, the robot played at lower deposit levels on both Swedish and foreign poker sites. The robot began construction in 2007. [HEADING=1]25,000 opponents[/HEADING] It is estimated that 45,000 opponents have met the robot, 25,000 of them lost money. The case was raised in Södertörn District Court, where the five were convicted of aggravated fraud and aiding and abetting fraud in 2012. A judgment that was later appealed to the Court of Appeal – where the five were acquitted. The district court judged that the 25,000 opponents the robot had not met knew that they met a robot, which had been misleading, and sentenced the five to a fine and conditional sentence. The money earned would also be forfeited. [HEADING=1]Acquitted in Court of Appeal[/HEADING] But the Court of Appeal made a different assessment, because they meant that the opponents' chance of winning was not less just because they met a robot. However, the Court of Appeal also argued that the proceedings had been misleading, but not so much so that there was no basis for the five for fraud. The defendants, and now acquitted, the men claimed during the two trials that it was not proven that the opponents disapproved they played against a robot. Although they may not know they met a robot. This is because the group made recordings of rounds, where they themselves informed opponents that a robot played, which according to them resulted in the opponents actually sitting further at the tables – than if they thought they played against a human being. However, the district court considers that this cannot be taken into account. [HEADING=1]Wanted to drive to HD[/HEADING] After the acquittal of the Court of Appeal, the prosecutor chose to appeal the verdict, and wanted to pursue the case on to the Supreme Court for a conclusion. The case was then handed over to the Prosecutor's Development Centre in Stockholm for preparation, which in turn has concluded to the decision not to send the case to the Supreme Court. Development centres write in the decision: [I]“The goal is relatively extensive. In order to allow the case to be taken up in the Supreme Court, the case must therefore be delimited appropriately. Even on the basis of the Court of Appeal’s assessment, I believe that there are several uncertainties that mean that the possible legal issue risks not being assessed.”[/I] The Development Centre, in turn, chose to pass the matter on to the Prosecutor General, but underlined the hesitation to send the case to HD. [HEADING=1]Prosecutor closes down[/HEADING] The Attorney General writes in his decision: [I]“The objective, which is extensive and partly marked by the evaluation of the evidence in the case, is not suitable for review in the Supreme Court.”[/I] The five men go free." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/uppsala/tjanade-3-8-miljoner-genom-pokerrobot-gar-fria[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
Online Poker
Poker Bot in online game
Top