Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jmbluffnstuff, post: 6919757, member: 158237"]
I don't see losing 57 in a row getting in dominating as "normal" variance. I see it as an anomaly, highly unlikely.
I didn't argue with anyone, I simply sent an e-mail asking the same question. How can this be "normal" variance and how long can this last?
No argument, the person from pokerstars didn't believe I was telling the truth, and requested me to send him the hands, which I did in several batches.
When I sent 50-57 he cut off contact, no more replies. Why I do not know.

If it makes you feel good to call me a fish, go right ahead, you cannot tilt me, so keep trying in vain if you desire.
I did have someone reply with a very good response who has also run like this and gave good feedback tactfully, unlike others, who drew conclusions and were totally condescending.

I do know this though. 
A fish can't turn $5 from a freeroll to almost 3k playing mostly 9 person S&G games. I credit the Sit N Go wizard for that. Excellent educational poker tool.
A fish doesn't finish in the top 7% of the stakes they played for a full year.
A fish cannot turn 15k play chips to 8.5 billion.

I also know this.
Smart people talk about ideas.
Average people talk about things.
And stupid people talk about other people to make themselves feel better because they have no inclination to achieve anything. So, they revel in the misfortune of others in a feeble attempt to do their pathetic lives justice.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us