Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sandy358, post: 7165016, member: 1040401"] Cbet-wise it kinda depends on your position and your stack size. But here is a bunch of stuff I noticed: * Cbet sizes heavily depend on the highest card on the board. In general, you size smaller on static ace or king-high boards and size up more and more on Q, J, T-high boards up to 9-high boards being usually completely drowned in cbet overbets * Monotone, straight and similar ultradrawy flops prefer microscopic bet sizings. And you check a lot too. You should never cbet big on monotone flops, and when someone does, one Sandy358 dies in agony out there * You size up your cbets with vulnerable made hands on connected boards. I believe, in order to kick gutshots out, as OESDs just won't fold on the flop most of the time * You size down on flush draw flops more often than not, but it depends on a bunch of factors I don't fully understand and sometimes bigger cbet sizes are preferred (though even in later scenario you check more) * Paired flops prefer smaller cbet sizings, with the frequency mostly determined by whose range has more trips on the flop (i.e. if you are UTG vs BB and the board is AA7 you cbet 100% of the time, ~80% of which is small size and ~20% is larger, but not overbet, size, while on A77 you check 70% of the time and cbet small 30% of the time). Paired flops with flush draws still take small bet sizes but now with much more checking. As you get shallower, you should size down. As far as I noticed, at 20BB flop overbets mostly disappear, and their role is mostly delegated to 2/3 pot large cbets. I believe minraises become viable, but I can't compare, because including 10% pot minraises in my deepstack solver trees will cause my computer to explode immediately and I need my computer. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us