Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tazztaz, post: 367597, member: 4062"] You must be referring to live poker, online poker is aggressive enough. As far as the books the ones I have read seem to target beginners. Poker theory is for making profitable decisions, based on odds which has lead me down a road of losing my cash to the one guy who should not have been in the pot in the first place. (all of this in reference to online poker) I would advise against taking any advise form me, as I have forgotten how to win at poker. The only thing I no how to do well is deposit and lose. In "theory" I should still be making money @ online poker. I often get a nice pay out at multi seat tournaments, and my SnG average is a steady %85. But i used to make most of my bankroll @ ring tables. As I said in "theory" I should still be making $ at the ring tables. I mix my game and adapt to table swings. My favorite place to make a buck used to be a real ag/ ring table where I would 1. profile the players 2. play tight / aggressive / deep stack poker employing poker theory. I would make my stay at these tables long and patient. Another place to pick up a buck or two was short stays at overly tight tables where I played lose aggressive, pulling in pot after pot until I tilt a solid player into dumping there stack in my lap when I wake up with a hand. These are strategies that should consistently generate an increasing bankroll. [B][U]Should[/U][/B] ! Could it be I was just lucky for two years and really have no clue how to win at poker? "Optimal strategy will win," ? Mixing up your game and adaptation to tables, table swings, and a range of opponents, and being able to put your opponent on there exact hand most of time, Shouldn't this be optimal? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us