Reply to thread by Casino.us

Message: [QUOTE="robwhufc, post: 348603, member: 4289"] More conservative? I'd have gone all-in! Certainly I think the fold after flop was correct. He may or may not have King, but you can be damn sure if you call him he will have. As I said, personally AQ I'd have gone all in. Player 1 raised, but that doesn't mean necessarily that he had better cards than you - there are a limited amount of hands that would come into that category and when table is down to 4, the likelihood decreases that someone will beat you. He'll either call or fold - if he calls and he's got KJ for example and hits King, then that's just bad luck. Final stages of sit and go you cant construct hands, worry about pot odds etc. A call or raise is often so large you'll be pot committed so it's all-in time. AQ will be enough for me. [/QUOTE]