Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diabloblanco, post: 326646, member: 4734"] This thread shouls be archived, bronzed, referenced, and only refered to with the greatest of reverence. I think it is a simple misunderstanding that has you and I locked in this gladitorial debate. I wasn't asking about the predication of two seperate hands before dealing them, I was asking about the proababilities of receiving the same hand on subsequent hands deal, which for my intent and purpose does not fluctuate. Fo' dawgs, think about it for a second. From the beginning, I came to this thread with an open mind and even in the face of great personal attacks, stated that if my ascertation was incorrect, I would admit it. I am the kind of person who always admits when he is wrong especially in the face of undeniable evidence. I was called names, it was inferred that I was stupid, and thick, yet I still stood by my statement all by myself. Then a couple of forum members; icepari, and xdmanx007 came to my defense and stated I was correct. I personally thanked them for getting involved because subscribing to my particular brand of snake-oil was forum suicide (ha ha). Look fo' dawgs, I actually took the time to go back and read EVERY post of EVERY member that opposed my original post in this thread and you are one of FEW that actually posted useable information. You are one of the few that I would accept advice from, or even want to play poker with for any other reason than to just gut a fish. I like you as a poster, and I think you know the intracacies of the game better than most. I'm not here to be holier than thou, smarter than the next guy, or to make the soopid people feel soopider. I joined this site because I wanted a place to come to where I could compare ideas with those of my skill level, help those below my skill level, and just generally bitch about poker with those that want to bitch about it. I kid, I kid...but not really. So the long and short of it is that I believe that we have a situation where my wording of the original post may have attributed to your misunderstanding of the situation as it were. If that is the case, we can agree to disagree and move on. If that isn't the case, by all means let the debate continue so that one of us eventually cries virtual uncle. On a side note to those that do not think this argument is realative to poker, or your poker game, you should seriously find a new hobby or stick to playing with fake money or in freerolls. Does this particular problem help you determine wether or not you will make your flush on the turn? No. But this is a statistical issue and poker is all about statistics. Dispite what I have read from some people on this site it isn't all about cards and the luck of said cards. Statistics give you the angle from which to minimize the already small amount of influence luck has. Good "luck" at the tables. I should add that calling you fo'dawgs was a complete joke and I mean no disrespect, nor is there any malicious intent therein. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language