Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Polished Poker Vol. I Study Group
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6712551, member: 289533"] Thanks for your reply and for being active once again. In my humble opinion GTO and Exploitative Game complete one another: we derive from Exploitative to GTO and vice-versa. I would like to quote an organic example: a few years ago I analyzed a hand where one student of this thread was playing NLHE 100. I will resume the hand: $100 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: [URL='http://www.pokertracker.com/']http://www.pokertracker.com[/URL] SB: 208.5 BB Hero (BB): 126 BB UTG: 91 BB MP: 111.4 BB CO: 125.9 BB BTN: 55.6 BB SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Tc Td fold, MP calls 1 BB, CO calls 1 BB, BTN calls 1 BB, fold, Hero raises to 11 BB, MP calls 10 BB, fold, BTN calls 10 BB Flop : (34.5 BB, 3 players) 3c 4h 2s Hero bets 23 BB, MP calls 23 BB, fold Turn : (80.5 BB, 2 players) Kc Hero bets 80.5 BB, MP calls 77.4 BB and is all-in 64 vpip whale. analysis? didn't want to play 3strts [B][U]Analysis: [/U][/B] I see this hand from a GTO perspective: okay, it’s fine to derive from GTO because there are several limpers behind. However, do we need to raise to 10x? In my opinion 6x or 7x at max would have the job done. The flops comes very coordinated and we elect to bet 2/3 pot expecting to get calls of missed aces. But limpers will have better hands than us quite often (22, 33, 44, 43s, 42s, 32s, 56s, A5s), hands that we own no removal. Okay that recreational players don’t think that much, but they know how to fold and what’s a value hand: betting that much preflop and flop we aren’t allowing villain to play close to perfection? OTT we have no idea what villain called about and we jam. We assume villain is a recreational but we also assume that one way or the other players have a little notion of sizing: complete losing hands would fold to a 10x raise preflop and hands with some playability will call: AJ+, K2s-AK, all pocket pairs (we don’t know if villain has a trap or not). Hero describes villain as a 64 VPIP “whale”. First, I think it’s unethical to call players like this or that using pejorative words. Weak player, recreational should suffice. 64 VPIP might be a tricky data. For how much hands played we had obtained this HUD stats? Why not other stats included? Hero says he didn’t want to play 3 streets, and haven’t put showdown results. Are we betting for value and for bluff or we are betting because we are not in the mood for playing 3 streets? When we jam turn, do we believe we own the winning hand? [B]GTO Perspective:[/B] [I]how would I have played this:[/I] Preflop I would raise to 6x. Flop I would go for 1/2 pot or a bit less, since the pot is too way bigger than normal and there are great chances of getting called by best hands. OTT I would’ve checked because now I have no idea what villain has called OTF. River I would’ve bet 1/2 pot if villain checks behind and it doesn’t complete a flush or another liner for a straight, and check in the case villain had bet OTT a fair price giving me odds. What do you think of this hand? What do you think on how hero played and how I would played it. Thanks in advance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Polished Poker Vol. I Study Group
Top