Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Mig32, post: 7170124, member: 1048996"]
From my own experience, 100 or even 1,000 hands isn't really enough to judge a strategy. Variance in poker can make a bad strategy look good (or a solid one look terrible) over a small sample. I personally think you start getting real insight after at least 10,000 hands, and ideally 50,000+ to spot consistent patterns in winrate and leaks.

That said, I also believe quality of review matters as much as quantity. Even in a smaller sample, if you're analyzing your hands carefully — understanding why a play worked or failed — you can evolve quickly. I’ve changed some strategies after just 500 hands, but only because I saw repeating mistakes and backed it up with study.

So for me, the combo is: play thousands of hands, but also review deeply. That’s where real improvement lives.

This thread below may could help you explore this aspect:

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cardschat.com/forum/learning-poker-57/how-many-hands-needed-really-evaluate-480439/[/URL]

Good luck with your strategies!
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread by Casino.us

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us