Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6672709, member: 289533"] You 3-bets to 3.8x having AA: remember this is NLHE 100 mate, there are just a couple of players at this limit and they know newcomers when they show up. Also, most of regulars are quite aware of bet sizings and pay a lot of attention to it. Villain bets 1/2 and we shove. Now I would love to put a question that is present in the Cardschat poker course on how to become a winning player in 30 days: when we jam on the flop we allow villain to play perfectly, we are risking more than 100 blinds to win 30 blinds. When we jam on the flop we are giving villain the sole opportunity to fold all of its worst hands and call our jam only with hands that have us beat. Needless to point that this move is very unbalanced and might work pretty fine at NLHE 2 ou NLHE 25, but this is NLHE 100. Big Blind is polarizing its 3-bet sizing a lot, and I think the main reason is because of hero/you: this player had noted that you are “aggro” and is simply try to exploit the exploiter. Once again, you are raising the top of your range higher and the bottom of your range lower: your 4-bet sizing is way too expensive and I ask if you are doing it with all of your 4-bet range (?). I thought you said you didn’t like to change your opening raises, sometimes you open to 2.2x and now you are opening to 3.4x... BB polarized 3-bet showing a lot of strength and hero... jams preflop, which is another unbalanced/not profitable move. Now you decided to 3-bet utilizing 3x sizing. Is it because you’re not so sure about JJ? If you were holding KK+ would you raise higher as you did on previous hands??? I really don’t get your bluff here. What exactly are you trying to do turning a value hand into a bluff in a scenario where we can have tons of calls of Ax, blocking narrowly AJ??? Conclusion: Don’t get me wrong, but you provided several details that could put you on a profile of a tilted player: a) playing several hours non-stop. b) moving to higher stakes suddenly, it looks like you have moved from NLHE 25 to NLHE 100, having huh, 4 buy-ins. c) playing very aggressively in almost every single hand. d) self-defense: you are explaining the reasons why you did this or that move and you are sure you are right. If you are so confident why post your hands here and self-analyze it? I’m not trying to offend you, I’m trying to be serious and take care of you, although I have no idea who you are, but it seems you are a fine person, and nobody deserves to be facing poker stress or a mental breakdown alone: I speak in the behalf of the whole community of CardsChat, we are on your side and back your decisions and we would love to see you healthy destroying NLHE 100. But it seems this is not the case, and if I’m wrong, forgive me, for my intention is to assist you when you most need help. I’m not any professional but I’m your forum mate, and I’m here to tell the truth and try to help you the best I can. You don’t have to assume here, you can deny but be faithful to your own self, say “no” here as much as you can and I respect that, but don’t do this to your own life: accept mistakes when they happen, and if this is the case of a tilt, quit the tables for a very long time. My most sincere regards; [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us