Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Four Dogs, post: 339463, member: 2668"]
Ooh, I like this one. A little structured hand analysis. Lets make some assumptions, we are in a tournament, we are seen as being a tight player, the raiser is known to be smart but agressive. This may be a good time for a squeeze. Assuming there are 3 higher cards than yours among the 4 already in your 7's have a better than 50% chance of holding up after the flop, but not after the river, and assuming the button and the blinds will fold in the face of this much action an over the top raise will sandwich the raiser between yourself and the caller who may elect to raise again. According to the gap concept the caller needed a greater hand to call a raise than to open with one. Unless UTG+2 has AA-QQ he should fold. The caller is now out of position against a tight reraiser and may fold as well. If he does not, You'll know he has a monster but heads-up 7,7 is not bad and you still have outs.
Did I get this right, or is this the kind of Harringtonian thinking that got me in trouble at Foxwoods?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language