Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Dorkus Malorkus, post: 436503, member: 6020"]
Villain appears to be at least as lucky as his dog, if the last hour at the table is anything to go by. Seems a little LAG and pretty much your average 1/2 player quality-wise, but no great reads tbh.

PokerStars Game #6381800172:  HORSE (Hold'em Limit, $1/$2) - 2006/09/22 - 19:22:50 (ET)
Table 'Irus' 8-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Wired Fives ($16.90 in chips) 
Seat 2: Realtorcraig ($41 in chips) 
Seat 3: Qhr1s ($122.75 in chips) 
Seat 4: SuperUnknown ($40.40 in chips) 
Seat 5: LuckysMyDog ($76.40 in chips) 
Seat 7: BACTERIA ($51.70 in chips) 
Seat 8: levin_money ($75.45 in chips) 
Qhr1s: posts small blind $0.50
SuperUnknown: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Qhr1s [8h 8s]
LuckysMyDog: raises $1 to $2
BACTERIA: folds 
zerovector joins the table at seat #6 
levin_money: folds 
Wired Fives: calls $2
Realtorcraig: folds 
Qhr1s: calls $1.50
SuperUnknown: folds 
*** FLOP *** [6h 3s 9c]
Qhr1s: checks 
LuckysMyDog: bets $1
Wired Fives: calls $1
Qhr1s: calls $1
*** TURN *** [6h 3s 9c] [4c]
Qhr1s: checks 
LuckysMyDog: bets $2
Wired Fives: folds 
Qhr1s: raises $2 to $4

You like, or is this a bit spewy? What are the merits of just calling down here as opposed to playing it as shown? Does anybody consider folding (lol)?

*** RIVER *** [6h 3s 9c 4c] [7c]
Qhr1s: bets $2

Like? Or should I be check/calling here?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us