Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="twizzybop, post: 380346, member: 2990"] Why I said basically.. it was a low bet based apon the pre-flop betting. Yet however the 300 bet I think was more of a feeler bet to see where he was standing. There was no re-raise on the flop by Nate. So what would you have put Nate on because he called for incorrect odds for the gut shot straight? Then he throws out another feeler bet on the turn against Nate because he called for incorrect odds on the flop to see where he stood. Nate has been a calling station so far. Yet he called Nate's re-raise.. even though Nate has the straight. The opponent had to be suspectable of the 10's out there for possible trips. Yet opponent called because he went with the %'s that Nate missed the flop completely and was trying to steal based apon the calls. [/QUOTE]