Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dbitel, post: 476706, member: 15503"]
zeb,
 
If I was to guess, it would be because you said IIRC that you play a lot of live poker.
 
In general, live poker players are thinking on a few levels below online players, so that would account for the difference in views.
 
As for preflop, 4xBB + 1 BB for every limper is standard.
 
We have to fold to the rr, as without reads, it reeks of a monster and Ajo is badly dominated
 
Flop is a very easy c/f. (An arguement could be made for a C/R AI if you're opponent 3bets very light and is capable of folding AK/AQ to a check/shove)
 
On the turn, we have to assume that we are way ahead (unless our opponent got tricky and checked JJ+ on the flop) Villain will just about never check 77-TT on the flop, so there is very little we can value bet aganst. if your read is such that villain will call a bet on teh turn with AK/AQ, then fine, bet...but otherwise, checking to induce a bluff is far better.
 
I don't know why you put villain on a Fd here, all he's done so far is to rr preflop and to check the flop (and most ppl will cbet the flop with 2 overs, a FD and a GS).
 
On the river, I got no idea why you are looking to fold. Its pretty tough to put villain on a hand with a 6 in, given preflop and his flop check.
 
Also, villain's reraise preflop with 67s is very nice (see my strt post on light 3betting) ESPECIALLY if hero is going to be calling reraises with AJo and playing fit or fold. His only mistake preflop was not reraising large enough.
 
On the flop, villain obv should have bet.
 
On the turn, villain has a trivally easy call as well
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language