Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="c0rnBr34d, post: 5419551, member: 394557"] Thanks, I haven't shared results but kudos for not looking for them. The flop is a bit of a mess. Here's how I looked at it. The 3 bet to $300 is still only equal to a single pot sized bet. So while normally it would be super polarizing I made the spot really awkward by downbetting too small by accident. I went with my gut that we were ahead and may continue to get action as V is still getting close to 4 to 1 to call on the flop and our line looks very fishy given the mistake. Once we get V to call flop we have an SPR 1 turn spot where we can shove often and put V in a really tough spot. I did not mean to suggest that we had V on only AJ+ at any point in the hand. But 3 bet continuing ranges rarely included hands as weak as A7 and A8. 44 and 88 are possible but with $1,250 effective V does not really have good odds to set mine so V should be folding at least most of the time. Obviously I could be wrong but in general those hands are less likely in a 3 bet pot when the 3 bet comes from a tighter player. I was also factoring in body language and reaction time. Villain would be faking concern if they actually had a set and would need much less time to act. Again, I could be wrong but Vs concern seemed real. To the degen, call happy, table vibe this was indeed the case. But 3 bet pots were still fairly rare and ranges were much narrower in 3 bet pots. If people were still calling with any 2 card in 3 bet pots then I would not have elected to bluff the A4hh. I was expecting his continuing pre flop range to look something like ATs+, AJo+, TT+ with the top end of that range 3 betting in front of me. Maybe a sticky suited broadway hand as well. But those should all be folding flop. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us