Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 6009583, member: 393841"] The money previous in the pot does not justify the investment with QQ. He doesn't even justify it with KK. In this case, hero must invest 13.42 times the size of the pot, to win 2.07 times the amount invested. On the other hand, the villain needs to bluff at least 48.20% of the time for the hero call to be profitable. And given the position of the villain UTG, it is extremely difficult to know this for sure, when we have a sample of 70 hands. If we go further and assume that the villain has a different image like: 50/30/20, we are still far away when the sample has 70 hands, because this size has a minimum margin of error of 30%, if we take 100 as the base. Based on a macro look, we have a clear range disadvantage to a UTG limper, who most likely decided to cheat us preflop. I liked how you played it, I would have played it exactly the same. Greetings. [/QUOTE]