Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 6023233, member: 393841"] I have some additional comments for this hand. It seems that the hero had solid information about his partner, the BB. That is, after the small opening of UTG and the check OTF line, hero's perception pointed to hands of type Axs and Kxs, a greater number of times in the range of BB. From that point of view, I can understand a smaller OTT raise size, to get more exploitive folds from this player. Although it is also true, that it is less likely to achieve a isolation with the opener, in a table where there is more flexibility in the ranges of continuation of the villains, in a live: 1/3. (I didn't get a chance to experience 1/3. I've played quite a bit on 5/5 and I can imagine what 1/3 would be like). So with the x / r OTT line, we also seek to exploit our perception of range at the table (we are not aggressive, in the eyes of others. At least we have not shown it in 45 minutes of play). Therefore, our perceived range should be strong here. The next question is: What hands do we expect UTG to call us OTT. From our OTF (capped range of V) appreciation, we can imagine some floating pairs in the UTG range. But when we raise, we eliminate a lot of them. And only hands that now have medium strength will continue, either because of their implied odds of improvement, or because of their current value (we are compensating some semi bluffs at rank V, by unlocking 9h-9 and 7h-7). OTR and continuing with our exploitative line, we want the villain to think that we want to make him believe that we make a great OTR bluff (overbet jam), so that he will pay us with all his marginal hands. But we actually represent a very strong hand here, as we didn't care about our OTT line and with many active players in the hand, we applied a small raise size. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us