Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 6082037, member: 393841"] I have not seen the final result of this hand played live. I don't think you're playing too tight if you 3-bet with UTG opener with JTs, but I don't think it's wrong to do it from BTN either, so I just hope you keep telling your story on this hand. The flop is quite heavy and has the greatest impact on V. You decide to make a slightly higher bet than half a pot. At this point, if I match the rank you set on your villain. AXs and maybe some flush draw. The problem is that we do not expect many flush draw combos that have a broadway other than Ah or Kh at most, due to the position of V. On the other hand, you block a negative hand for you (QJs) because it increases the possibility of isolating yourself with stronger hands, such as QK or AQ of slow played. There really is little fold equity in UTG, if he decides to call on the flop. So it is not necessary to place a very large OTF bet size, even check behind seems reasonable here (for example). As played if you bet the flop, you should continue to bet the turn. But here the villain decides to lead. He makes a fairly small bet, which could be interpreted as a bluff induction or a block. So the turn call seems correct to me, considering that we will not get folds often enough, unless we bet super aggressive, but I do not think it is the appropriate scenario to try that line. On the river I agree that you should go shoving your chips. You will rarely win in these places, because the villain has an advantage of range, while you represent all the TPTK or failed flush draws. So UTG could start by catching bluffs with 2 pairs and better. Greetings. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language