Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 5655925, member: 393841"]
In general I agree.  I am sure you know that data has a distorting component in poker, and this is the standard deviation of the values, product of the random component.  Which will always remain.  Whatever sample size we take. If we add to this, other dispersion measures such as variance (dispersion that coexists, along with the other randomness factor of the game).  We will find values that will fluctuate more times in time.  A real proof of this is your 6 samples of 14-18k.
Although it seems little difference 5% from 14 to 19% for hero for a sample of 13500 hands, in reality it is not.  And you can start to define a specific and differentiated style of play.  But in these differences also intervene to a large extent, the aspects that I mentioned at the beginning.  Having said all this, we could say that it is a fallacy the fact of certain unjustly imposed forms, such as the argument that the VPIP / PFR gap has to be the same or very similar, to consider a poker player good.
In fact I talk this with other players outside this forum, and it really puts us in a good mood to talk about it.  Without detracting from the fact that it is true, that the difference should not be very significant.  But a 8-12 point difference (VPIP/PFR) does not automatically make a poker player a bad player.  There are many other factors to consider.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us