Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6680381, member: 289533"] Hi there dear mate, happy Sunday. Against known aggressive players I like to be more passive and wait like a snake to let villain hang itself. Preflop our 4-bet is fine if we are expecting villain to fold preflop more than calling. I would love to have any suited aces better than AQo to put up a 4-bet against it. We could’ve just called from BU if UTG hasn’t opened first, and if we know there are weaker players in the blinds that could pop up and join the pot. Villain is aggressive but is it 3-betting in a high frequency against EP? Which hands do we expect villain to be doing it? The flop comes good to us and villain check-raises... this is embarrassing! OTT completes the flush and comes a King, in theory we do own most of nutted flushes here and villain pushes his entire stack. Once again, unless I have a solid analysis that villain is tilted, I would fold it right now. And even if villain is tilted, it could have KJ, Kx, Jx, and we are calling to see if we do hit an ace or a flush nuts OTR. Like I said, versus aggro I would play more passively than normal, inducing villain to make more mistakes. If we do had AsQs, of course we would be going til the end, even if it doesn’t come another spades OTT. Although villain had demonstrated weakness OTF, we don’t have any winning hand, just a hand with showdown value. We also would be pretty optimistic, waiving villain to have hands like A2, A3, A5... villain has all the hands that have us beat OTT and we have barely 15% equity for stacks OTR. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language