Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hermus, post: 6155431, member: 346197"] Nice hand! The range you posted seems decently accurate for a BU vs SB 3-bet flatting range. I don't know this particular player but the micro stakes player pool definitely over-folds when facing a 3-bet. Against an unknown players, give them credit for a tighter range. On this dry texture, against the wide calling range that you think villain is playing, I think c-betting your entire 3-bet vs BU RFI range is good. Any backdoor draws you might have just give you a slight equity edge on top of the fold equity you get from betting, but I don't think you'll need it. If villain's 3-bet calling range is tighter than you might think JTs is still a good combo to c-bet with but I would check some Axs and Kxs in my range. I think most players have learned to get sticky on the flop with pretty marginal holdings including overcards and backdoor draws. On the turn is where it actually gets interesting. Because you c-bet (close to) 100% of your range but villain folds a sizeable portion of his range facing that bet, villain now has the range advantage on the turn. The Q is good for your specific holding, but the card is actually better for villain's range since he's supposed to have folded all his junk already. I like betting with JTs though since you'll still have plenty of value combo's, JTs is towards the bottom of your range if you miss, and we have some outs that play most of the time. Once you get raised I agree that it's most likely for value. I don't really like that K9s and Q9s are in villain's raising range but with the odds presented it's still a call. Once the money card hits shoving is probably the best way to get the money in. He might call with some top pair combo's that he would've otherwise checked back and he's for sure calling with trips, straights and boats. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language