Forum
CardsChat Freerolls
Best Online Poker Sites
US Online Poker
Delaware Online Poker
Michigan Online Poker
Nevada Online Poker
New Jersey Online Poker
Pennsylvania Online Poker
Canada Online Poker
UK Online Poker
Australia Online Poker
India Online Poker
Ireland Online Poker
New Zealand Online Poker
Best Freerolls
Best Poker Bonuses
Best Mobile Poker Sites & Poker Apps
Poker Site Reviews
888poker
Betfair
GGpoker
PartyPoker
PokerStars
Unibet
Poker
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Strategy & Rules
30 Day Poker School
Texas Hold'em Starting Hands
Poker Games
Odds for Dummies
10 Tips for Winning Online
How Much Money Can You Make Playing Poker?
How To Play Poker
Texas Hold'em
Omaha
Omaha Hi-Lo
Badugi
Open Faced Chinese
Video Poker
Poker Hands
Tools
Poker Hands Converter
Poker Odds Calculator
Organise a Home Game
Poker Glossary
Tournaments
WSOP
WSOP Winners
WSOP History
WSOP Events
WSOP News
European Poker Tour
Best Poker Players
Poker News
Podcast
Best Online Casinos
US Online Casinos
Connecticut Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
New Jersey Online Casinos
Pennsylvania Online Casinos
West Virginia Online Casinos
Canada Online Casinos
UK Online Casinos
Australia Online Casinos
India Online Casinos
Ireland Online Casinos
New Zealand Online Casinos
Real Money Casinos
Blackjack Online Casinos
Roulette Online Casinos
Baccarat Online Casinos
Best Mobile Casinos & Apps
Best Casino Bonuses
Best Payouts
No Deposit Casinos
Free Spins
Casino Site Reviews
Betway
Casumo
JackpotCity Casino
PokerStars Casino
Ruby Fortune
Spin Casino
Casino
Free Online Casino Games
Slots
Best Online Sites
How to Play Slots
Slots Software Reviews
Real Money Gambling
US Online Gambling
Canada Online Gambling
UK Online Gambling
Australia Online Gambling
New Zealand Online Gambling
India Online Gambling
Ireland Online Gambling
Casino News
Awards
Search forums
News
Poker News
Tournament News
Casino News
Legal
Scandals
Opinion
Podcast
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$100 NLHE 6-max: Spew contest? Fundamental theorem of poker spot?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="c0rnBr34d, post: 5774206, member: 394557"] [B]PokerStars - $1 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players[/B] [I][URL="http://www.pokertracker.com"]Hand converted by PokerTracker 4[/URL][/I] [B]Hero (BB): 112.55 BB[/B] UTG: 116.68 BB MP: 100 BB CO: 62.5 BB BTN: 234.89 BB [B]SB: 112.03 BB[/B] [B]SB[/B] posts SB 0.5 BB, [B]Hero[/B] posts BB 1 BB [B]Pre Flop:[/B] [I](pot: 1.5 BB)[/I] [B]Hero[/B] has A[COLOR=black]♣[/COLOR] K[COLOR=black]♠[/COLOR] [I]fold[/I], [COLOR=red]MP raises to 2.25 BB[/COLOR], [I]fold[/I], [I]fold[/I], [COLOR=red][B]SB[/B] raises to 5.7 BB[/COLOR], [COLOR=red][B]Hero[/B] raises to 17 BB[/COLOR], [I]fold[/I], [B]SB[/B] calls 11.3 BB [B]Flop:[/B] [I](36.25 BB, 2 players)[/I] 3[COLOR=red]♥[/COLOR] 5[COLOR=black]♣[/COLOR] 9[COLOR=red]♥[/COLOR] [COLOR=red][B]SB[/B] bets 17.22 BB[/COLOR], [B]Hero[/B] calls 17.22 BB [B]Turn:[/B] [I](70.69 BB, 2 players)[/I] 4[COLOR=red]♦[/COLOR] [B]SB[/B] checks, [COLOR=red][B]Hero[/B] bets 35 BB[/COLOR], [B]SB[/B] calls 35 BB [B]River:[/B] [I](140.69 BB, 2 players)[/I] 8[COLOR=black]♣[/COLOR] [B]SB[/B] checks, [COLOR=red][B]Hero[/B] bets 43.33 BB and is all-in[/COLOR], [B]SB[/B] calls 42.81 BB and is all-in [spoiler][B]Hero[/B] shows A[COLOR=black]♣[/COLOR] K[COLOR=black]♠[/COLOR] (High Card, Ace) (Pre 74%, Flop 15%, Turn 11%) [B]SB[/B] shows 3[COLOR=black]♣[/COLOR] A[COLOR=red]♦[/COLOR] (One Pair, Threes) (Pre 26%, Flop 85%, Turn 89%) [B]SB[/B] wins 223.31 BB Rake paid 3 BB [/spoiler] Ok, so Hero looks fishy at this table because we have two regs that 3 bet a ton and have adjusted to 4 betting wider but have not shown down any light 4 bets. Also have been set mining quite a bit in the small 88 hand sample so this could effect how V plays. V is also looking fishy over an even smaller sample of 24 hands. I'm not happy with my post flop line, particularly bet sizing. I can see going smaller flop and turn to jam river or slightly larger flop and jamming turn but the middle of the road line seems bad with no fold equity on the river. I WOULD do this with KK+ though. From a fundamental theorem of poker perspective, if we can see V's hand, aren't we playing it in similar fashion? I'd be fine if we got shown TT here but how does this guy stack off with bottom pair in a cold 4 bet pot over 3 streets? I've never in my life called a cold 4 bet OOP with A3o, and I've had some pretty spewy hands. V was legit in the tank every street post flop and it obviously wasn't Hollywood. I may have given up if we got flatted more quickly. H - VP 29 / PR 20 / 3B 6 / AF 2 / 4B 33 (88 hands, so may look a bit more drastic to V) V - VP 54 / PR 25 / 3B 0 / AF 4 (24 hands) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$100 NLHE 6-max: Spew contest? Fundamental theorem of poker spot?
Top