Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 5629298, member: 393841"]
JT is a good combination to play it. We can call or raise from PF. Maybe it is better to call in NL10 when we are IP and we are facing a villain with a deep stack (this is not the case, since V is effective with 160bb), because MP will have a better playing margin and will often limit our SPR in the postflop.
On the flop we can make a continuation bet, since from MP the villain could protect the table pair with some combinations like Ax; Kx. Although we are behind better draws (AT; KT; QT; KQ) these possibilities are compensated by worse pairs than villain could call here. For example: T-T; 8-8; 7-7. While overpairs in range V are less likely, because is most possible that they leading the bet in preflop.
On the turn your bet is a little small. It is necessary to balance the sizes higher here, since you did not bet on the flop and you are also very unprotected (the T protects you only 62% of the time, compared to better kickers).
On the turn the villain's raise is a bit artificial. What makes me doubt is the size that V used (2X). This sounds like some middle hand like A-3, for which the villain chooses to extract more value from a depolarized hero range, for example from: AK; AQ; QK; QT.
On the river the villain bet polarizes his range between trips of 9 and double pairs minors than the hero. Without reads abouts V this is a standard fold for NL10.
Greetings.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us