Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: Good Bluff?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 5634896, member: 289533"] Hi there dear mate, good to see you are into cash tables! :D Well, first thing we have to consider is that we are opening many hands from the CO, varying from 15% to 30% hands/range or even more depending on the table/player/perceived range, etc. When BTN calls, it also has a pretty fair range, also could be something between 20% and 40%, give or take. One thing I have already discussed here with other players is the modern tendency for opening raises to be smaller, specially when we are in position, like Hero/You. Because we are opening too many hands from these positions (CO and BTN), it is wise to choose a sizing that can fit for all of our range, and in the long run 3 blinds is a huge investment, far superior than investing just 2.5 blinds: consider that for every single hand you open IP with a sizing of 2.5 blinds (x), you are saving 0.5 blinds, so for every 200 hundred hands played IP we are saving 100 blinds, which is something to be looking for. The postflop is a matter of the situation, but usually we can be c-betting or checking this flop in the same ratio (50% checking, 50% c-betting), and the size you used is perfect, because we can have many hands here and air and draws and the sizing takes into account all of these possibilities. When BTN calls, it could have did it with Jx, 8x, even some 3x, although we are blocking A3hh, the flush draws and straight draws. The Turn is good for both ranges, both players can have now hands like Q8, J8, Qx, Jx and the draws, and once we are blocking the flush nuts. OTT we can use many sizings, depending on what you want to do OTR: do you want to bet little OTT to put a bomb OTR? Do you want to bet heavy OTT to shove all-in on many rivers? Well, considering we are blocking the nut flush, I would personally go for polarization here, charging specially from Two Pair, Sets and another Flushes or Flush Draws, and I would go for 100% pot or even more to put Villain all-in in almost 100% of rivers. By betting so small we give the chance for Villain to realize its equity for a cheap price OTR, and this is not so good for us. I don't understand your bet sizing OTR. When you bet so small a sizing like this it seems that either you have the flush and wants to be paid ASAP or that you have some strong second hand such as TPTK, Two Pair or Sets and got scared of the flush but even so wanted to extract thin value from worst hands OTR: by betting so little Villain can easily call with a lot of hands that have us beat such as lower flushes, Two Pair and Sets, but Villain elects to re-raise, where it shouldn't be raising, basically, never. Villain should never be raising here because it is trying to represent the nut flush on which we are blocking. I am only putting up a shove right here if I know my opponent is a reasonable, decent player, at least. Many regulars are not folding lower flushes or sets in situations like this so when we do go all-in with TPTK + Missed FD, it is awesome, good and fine, but this is move that relies entirely on who you are playing with. Coming back to the subject I started on the turn, this is why we should go for heavier bets OTT if our plan is to go all-in on many rivers, because for the times we really do own the nut flush, or hit the nut flush OTR, it would be impossible for Villain to fold the vast majority of its range, because of the SPR: when we bet more OTT we commit both ourselves and Villain much more than simplying going for a small bet: A smart player would be calling you down 100% of times, OTR, even with KQ for example, when you go for such lower bets OTT and OTR. By doing this you are giving free information for experient players, which was not the case: which hands raise OTR and fold to a push??? Why Villain raised anyway if it believed it had the best holding? ;) And believe me, Villain would have much more QJ, J8, Q8, 86, 33 and 66 than us/Hero, so..:evil: Regards; Carlos 'Aballinamion' Barbosa [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: Good Bluff?
Top