Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: AQs vs MP Limp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 6220323, member: 393841"] If your goal is to punish the limper in preflop, on the flop you are representing a wider range with your check. And as for your villain, do you really think he wouldn't bet if he flopped a set? The maximum amount combinations of set combos that V can have on the flop is 6 (2 combos for each set) and the total of cards now is 47, which makes a probability of 12.76% that V has obtained a set on the flop. But actually from a villain's perspective, the chance of landing a set preflop is 6/52 or 11.53%. This indicates that most likely a standard V when he hits a set on the flop, he will try to get value from that point on. Unless you have observed that this villain is very passive and does not usually bet his bingo hands well (when he should bet), we would not have to include these combinations very often in his range on that board. On the turn it looks like you are trying to recover value from some hands that you didn't bet on the flop. The question is: What hands can we really bet? We shouldn't having bet hands like KK; QQ; TT OTF? Therefore our range is perceived more as made up of semi bluffs. Maybe gutshots with blockers of heart and of course Axs we have too. And regarding the calling range V, there could be flush draw combos, in this case it is good not to block the ace of hearts. Now with greater security we can say that if V slowly played in preflop with a strong combination like yours (AQ or AK), he could possibly behave more aggressive here (mainly if his hand is also a flush draw). Therefore we are winning at hands that have implied river probability and are only beaten by A4hh, as any other 2 pair off combo would seek protection here. The river is neutral because it really is an absolute brick. However, if we really believe that this villain played passive preflop, now is the right time where he can bluff with a hand like AKo, as draws have failed for us. Therefore, it seems more appropriate to try a smaller bet, which acts as an action blocker. And fold a raise. But if your suspicion is that this villain has a wider range, I like your size and would even call to try and catch a bluff. Greetings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: AQs vs MP Limp
Top